![]() I’ll see you all when I’ve written something worth reading and put it in this spot where it belonged. This blog has changed a fair bit since those initial posts, now covering weekly news updates as well as the Gunslinger project I’m involved in. It’s probably best to follow the blog on the homepage to know when it happens or follow me on Patreon. It’s going to be at this link (so don’t bin it) but it’s going to be a lot more useful, written by someone who has more of an idea of what the heck he’s doing. A game report isn’t something we originally planned to do with the blog but having jumped in with a purchase of Spectre Operations new rules, despite having had very little game play out of the original set, we thought we’d share the game and offer our opinion and invite comments. ![]() Allerdings muss man gleich klarstellen: außer dem Grundprinzip (ein Spieler bewegt sich unsichtbar über den Plan, die anderen jagen ihn) hat SPECTER OPS mit dem altehrwürdigen. 7 years later, still no one is covering Ultramodern Wargaming but I feel like I can do better. SPECTER OPS ist ein Stealth-Spiel für 2-5 Spieler - und salopp könnte man es auf den ersten Blick als Cyberpunk Scotland Yard auf Steroiden bezeichnen. In 2016 I’d been wargaming for two years, barely knew anyone and wrote the first article in a freezing cold flat in Edinburgh because no one else was covering Ultramodern Wargaming. With that out the way, let me say something more interesting – It’s going to have a replacement. I’m honestly not a big fan of it as it stands. The rulesets on that list have either aged gracefully or just been replaced as game design moved on.Īlso I’m going to be honest? The article honked – it was written by someone who hadn’t actually been writing very much, about rules I had played very few times and presented in a way designed to be factual but ended up being boring as sin. We have been gifted with a flurry of new rulesets, updated sets and sadly some sets being impossible to find. It was written back in 2016 (with an update in 2017) – as I’m writing this update, it’s 2023 which means A LOT has changed. However, there is a problem with this article. ![]() This article has been a bit of a monolith, regularly being my second most visited page on my blog apart from the front cover. If you’re reading this, you’ve probably followed a link to read about a single all-consuming Comparison article about Ultramodern Wargaming. This is Michael Charge, the guy who has been running this blog since it started.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |